The web has an AI slop problem.
AI used well is not the problem. Mass-produced AI slop is, and it is drowning out the people who actually make things. We're giving everyone a button: rate the page you're on, then see what the community thinks.
No account. No passive browsing history. You choose when to send a signal.
Sponsored insight
10 mind-blowing trends you can't ignore
Right-click an eligible public page. Pick a side. Done.
Already suspicious?
Check a URL.
Checks happen only when you press the button. Private and token-bearing URLs are rejected.
The problem, with receipts
AI slop is crowding out the people who make things.
Recommendations, charts, search results and marketplaces are finite. Every slot taken by mass-produced AI content is a slot a real creator did not get, and the money follows the slots.
21%
of the first 500 Shorts recommended to a brand-new YouTube account were AI slop. One AI slop channel with 2 billion views is estimated to earn $4.25 million a year.
Kapwing AI Slop Report, Nov 2025 ↗50%+
of new music uploaded to Deezer each day is fully AI-generated, about 90,000 tracks daily. Up to 85% of the streams on those tracks were fraudulent.
Deezer, Jul 2026 ↗~50%
of new articles published on the web are AI-generated. AI-written articles overtook human-written ones in November 2024.
Graphite, 2025 ↗2025
Word of the year. Macquarie chose “AI slop”; Merriam-Webster chose “slop”: low-quality digital content produced in quantity by AI.
Macquarie · Merriam-Webster ↗Artists and small shops on Pinterest describe engagement collapsing under AI images; YouTube's chief executive has called managing AI slop a priority. Platforms are responding one at a time, with labels, filters and takedowns, and only inside their own walls. Nothing lets people say it themselves, anywhere on the web, and see whether others agree. That is the button.
Three moves. No feed. No follows.
A public signal with almost no friction.
V1 answers one question: will people build a habit of rating AI slop when they encounter it?
01 / 03
Spot AI slop
Generic, repetitive, mass-produced, context-poor or offering little original value. Using AI well is not slop; churning it out is.
02 / 03
Make one deliberate choice
Right-click the page or open the extension. Choose “Feels like AI slop” or “Doesn’t feel like AI slop.”
03 / 03
See the community read
A score appears only after enough eligible ratings and effective evidence—and pauses automatically when activity looks unusual.
What the number means
Not a robot lie detector.
The score records a community judgement about perceived quality. It never claims to prove authorship, factual accuracy or misconduct.
Community Slop Score
example.com/article
Eligible ratings
248
Display threshold
20 ratings + effective evidence
Illustrative example with made-up numbers, not a live score. Scores are rounded to avoid false precision. Fewer than five ratings produces no aggregate; suspicious bursts pause publication.
The line we will not cross
AI ≠ slop.
Original, useful work does not become slop because AI helped make it. The target is the flood of low-effort, mass-produced AI output that buries real creators—not tools, people or styles.
Privacy by deliberate action
No passive browsing history.
- Opening the popup: sends only a content fingerprint to look up a score.
- Casting a vote: sends the scrubbed page identity, choice, optional fixed reasons and a pseudonymous credential.
- Never collected: page text, comments, forms, cookies, account data or unrelated browsing.